Anarco- means violent

No border, no government, legal slavery!

“A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds, adored by little statesmen and philosophers and divines. –Ralph Waldo Emerson

Nazi war criminals were being tried and hanged at Nuremberg, with the impromptu panel of judges unable to agree on the meaning of “Aggressive war.” Yet all agreed the term applied accurately to war the enemy government waged. Ayn Rand at 40 was concerned with definitions and meaning: “Men do not even agree on their interpretation of natural laws, let alone the much more difficult moral laws.”

In an informal letter to a friend, Ayn Rand was worrying over the definition of individualism, the subject of her gushing 1934 letter to H.L. Mencken. Her off-the cuff improvisation went like this:

For a practical definition, if men merely agree that no man or number of men have the right to initiate the use of force against any human being (and that includes the forcible seizure of his property), that they have no such right for any purpose whatsoever, at any time whatsoever—that would be all we need, that would achieve a perfect Utopia on earth, that would include all the moral code we need.
I hope this will be helpful to you. I could write volumes on the subject (and intend to some day), but I can’t do it in a letter. As it is, this is just a hasty statement, without revisions.

Rand’s criticisms of German National Socialism and the entire gamut of nearly identical mystical altruist collectivism nurtured in America by the Prohibition Party, WCTU, Klan, Republican Party, Christian Front, Silver Shirts, German-American Bund and all the other Trojan horse, fifth column, spies, saboteurs and traitors remarked on by President Roosevelt–and even FDR’s own policies. Previously aired in The Fountainhead, her portrayals were gaining sharp focus in the tenth chapter of her work-in-progress “The Strike,” when she dashed off a letter to her friend Linda.

A year later, with Otto Rasch and Adolph Ott in the dock for Nazi war crimes, she took to task one of Hitler’s fellow Austrians then being courted by Republican Party champions of mystical altruist collectivism, Ludwig Von Mises. Gone was the toothbrush mustache and Austrian citizenship. Emigré Von Mises now presumed to lecture Americans on [get this!] economics. His assertions that Crashes were caused by “destructionism,” and not by Republican laws redefining vices, production and trade as crimes were received by “former” Klan, Silvershirt, Bund, Coughlinite and Christian Front activists with whoops of joy!(link)

Eager for relief from blame for crashing the economy by poisoning alcohol and waging moralistic jihads against enjoyable drugs in 1907, 1914, 1929, 1931 and 1933, Republicans had found their champion. Mises, they imagined, could help them distance themselves from Hitler’s Positive Christianity, God’s Own dictator Franco and the Duce’s treaty putting catechism into government schools. Like “apolitical” import Wernher von Braun on rocket-bombs, von Mises depicted the exchange of values as abstract and amoral. His Jewish ancestry could even shield tender conservative feelings from unkind references to their former role models and ideals.

Like Adam Smith before her, Ayn Rand understood that economics–the science of values–could not be separated from ethical, and political principles. When Atlas Shrugged hit the stands nine years later, God’s Own Prohibitionists were horrified. Rand’s explanation of panics, crashes and depressions had predictive value, testable against the facts of reality soon to unfold in 1972(link). Nixon’s weaponizing of border crossings in prohibitionism against plant leaves caused a recession as Rand’s admirers formed a political party based on her non-aggression principle.(link) As soon as the votes were counted, Comstock’s cruel laws forcing women into involuntary labor of reproduction were overturned.(link)

Yet infiltration by violent communists and mystical fascists had begun as in 1921, 1928 and 1933. The admitted sloppiness of her facile prescription these looters equivocated, countering with assertions that to stop someone from sneaking into the national border or jimmying open your back windows was the initiation of force. Rand’s reaction was to turn against libertarians dumb enough to be so easily gulled by spurious consistency and back the Nixon regime instead. Later she recognized in Reagan the same superstitious instinct for enslaving the fair sex that Harriett Beecher Stowe had exposed in her support for the Ninth (and later Thirteenth and Fourteenth) Amendments the Prohibition and Republican parties sought to violate in their efforts to force women at gunpoint to reproduce like chattel dams.

That is how mystical belief in assertions led the Red Republicans full circle into actually advocating the return of the slavery they once opposed.


Good reading: The Letters of Ayn Rand (link)


Republican policies cause major crashes

Find out the juicy details behind the mother of all economic collapses. Prohibition and The Crash–Cause and Effect in 1929 is available in two languages on Amazon Kindle, each at the cost of a pint of craft beer.

Brazilian Sci-fi from 1926 featuring the usual beautiful daughter of a scientist touting prohibition and racial collectivism in America’s Black President 2228 by Monteiro Lobato, translated by J Henry Phillips (link)

Three dollars on Amazon Kindle

Brazilian blog

LIBtranslator on Blogger

Tagged: individual rightslibertarianmimesisparasitismpolitical economy and ethical valuesSpoiler cloutwinning

Kansas Libertarians v Slavery

Forcing women into the labor of involuntary reproduction is enslavement. Pregnant women are individual persons, not Siamese twins. “All persons born…” states the constitutional beginning of personhood in the USA’s 14th Amendment. The 13th Amendment says:

Section 1
Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.

Section 2
Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.

The original (link) 1972 Libertarian Party platform contained a plank about this which read:

We support an end to all subsidies for childbearing built into our present laws, including all welfare plans and the provision of tax-supported services for children. We further support the repeal of all laws restricting voluntary birth control or voluntary termination of pregnancies during their first hundred days. We shall oppose all coercive measures to control population growth.

The Supreme Court was at that time struggling with a 9th Amendment 5th Circuit case in Texas, which State sought to force a woman to reproduce against her will. Meanwhile in Canada a doctor once persecuted in Europe by Positive Christian National Socialists, had opened a clinic serving women in Quebec.(link) Dr Henry Morgentaler was charged with offences in 1970–before the Libertarian party was organized in Colorado.

Pro-choice, pro-defense LP Happytalism earned maybe 4000 votes but also got one electoral vote in the November elections, which made us impossible to ignore when the real votes were counted in January 1973.

Sixteen days after the Electoral votes were counted, the Supreme Court decision of 22JAN1973 began with (a) For the stage prior to approximately the end of the first trimester, the abortion decision and its effectuation must be left to the medical judgment of the pregnant woman’s attending physician.(link)

Jurors in Canada agreed with the U.S. Supreme Court and acquitted Dr Morgentaler in 1974. As in Roe, weaponized mysticism sought again to put the doctor in jail, and again the jury preferred medicine to girl-bullying superstition and monstrous teratophilia. That and another election ended the matter so that there are NO girl-bullying laws to threaten doctors in Canada. Comstockists, race-suicide collectivists and persons addled by belief in devils and invisible pals still seek to send men with guns out to force women against their will.(link)

But this was true in the 1840s, when Harriet Beecher Stowe told of how slave women had no defense against rapists nor got to keep their children–as in Texas today, thanks to the gradual, stepwise, cowardly betrayal of women’s rights by committees.

Stowe revealed how God’s Self-appointed Ministers and Elders cowered and shied away from defending the individual rights of all women in 1843:

“Whereas there is in this Assembly great diversity of opinion as to the proper and best mode of action on the subject of slavery; and whereas, in such circumstances, any expression of sentiment would carry with it but little weight, as it would be passed by a small majority, and must operate to produce alienation and division; and whereas the Assembly of 1839, with great unanimity, referred this whole subject to the lower judicatories, to take such order as in their judgment might be adapted to remove the evil;–Resolved, That the Assembly do not think it for the edification of the church for this body to take any action on the subject.” (link)

In other words, God’s mystics adopted a cowardly straddle and betrayed freedom and rights to appease alienation and division as reported in Stowe’s Tale of the Great Dismal Swamp. The Libertarian party was gaining new voters at the rate of 12% per year from 1972 to 1980, when pressure from infiltrating Swamp Republicans changed the platform to single out pregnant women women for discrimination:

“We oppose any compulsory insurance or tax-supported plan to provide health services, including those which finance abortion services.” Women began crossing the street to avoid Libertarian candidates.

Soon the LP platform changed to this:

“Recognizing that abortion is a sensitive issue and that people can hold good-faith views on all sides, we believe that government should be kept out of the matter, leaving the question to each person for their conscientious consideration.” The LP vote share became a horizontal line from 1980 until Gary Johnson’s pro-choice campaign in 2016, when we more than tripled to 4 million votes with 13 spoiler clout states.

The post-Anschluss national Tea-bertarian party has smothered, omitted, elided, memory-holed all platform utterances to the effect that pregnant women have individual rights.

Just now, only the Kansas Libertarian Party has shown the integrity, consistency and backbone it takes to stand up to the mentality that–before the American Revolution–burned women at the stake to please God, Jesus, Allah and Mohammed. Remember that when you are ready to donate to support a worthy Libertarian organization.(link)


Good bad books: The Economic Waste of Sin, by Lahman Forrest Bower. The Abdingon Press, Cincinnati, 1924. That was the year of the KKKlambakes, the Democratic Party endorsing the Prohibition law President Wilson vetoed, and the party platform plank suddenly recognizing a side effect of prohibition:
“Recognizing in narcotic addiction, especially the spreading of heroin addiction among the youth, a grave peril to America and to the human race, we pledge ourselves vigorously to take against it all legitimate and proper measures for education, for control and for suppression at home and abroad.” Bower believed beer was a gateway drug that led inexorably to heroin–NOT heroin as an easily-concealed replacement for Beelzebub’s banned beer! Get it at

Republican policies cause major crashes

Find out the juicy details behind the mother of all economic collapses. Prohibition and The Crash–Cause and Effect in 1929 is available in two languages on Amazon Kindle, each at the cost of a pint of craft beer.

Brazilian Sci-fi from 1926 featuring the usual beautiful daughter of a scientist touting prohibition and racial collectivism in America’s Black President 2228 by Monteiro Lobato, translated by J Henry Phillips (link)

Three dollars on Amazon Kindle

Brazilian Expatriotas blog

LIBtranslator on Blogger

Tagged libertarianmimesisparasitismpolitical economy and ethical valuesSpoiler cloutindividual rightswinning