Repeal Victimless Usurpations

 

If either Kleptocracy party wants to “win,” its platform should include repeal, decriminalize and expunge. Tarl tells it like it is, but leaves out the relative law-changing clout of Libertarian spoiler versus Kleptocracy bootlicking votes.(link)

Remember Jerome Tuccille? He was a Libertarian candidate back about 1976, and wrote “It Usually Begins with Ayn Rand,” which I recommend.(link) He also wrote a Trump bio I haven’t read. But the important thing was the lesson he learned as a candidate. Every vote cost $6 in campaign spending at that time. Converting to current dollars, all else held constant, today’s votes would cost $36 apiece in 2020 dollars. 

It's a hard rain...

Spoiler vote replacement effect

So if I were to waste a vote on the Dem or GOP platform promises, that 0.00000007% of the vote total would accrue to the benefit of one or the other looter party as $36 worth. But the Libertarian party vote growth rate in 2016 was increasing at a slope of 1.2, which is an angle of 50 degrees, accelerating rapidly. This rapid growth imparts extra law-changing heft to each libertarian vote–heft that does not require that our candidates be sworn in

But Libertarian candidates did win 73 races last year, a palpable drain of money away from Kleptocracy coffers and an enormous decrease in their effective social pressure.(link) Their party mathematicians are painfully aware of these facts–especially the fact that when the LP.org vote share is larger than the difference between their “winner” and “loser,” the probability projections for their loot, pelf and boodle go out the window. Libertarian spoiler votes pack roughly 20x the law-changing clout of bootlicking Kleptocracy votes. So on average, LP spoiler votes are worth $720 apiece. If you instead vote Kleptocracy you are throwing away $684 worth of vote clout!

 

Nixon almost lost when girl-bullying racial collectivists handed George Wallace the electoral votes for four Dixiecrat States. Wallace, like JFK, was quickly riddled with bullets, which was the equivalent of a Chappaquiddick incident for nomination purposes.(link) The GOP absorbed the Klan and broke up the Solid South. On their third confrontation with the Libertarian Party–whose 1972 plank was rewritten as the Roe v Wade decision, Dems in 1980 plunked for subsidized birth control (link) rather than the Libertarian solution of deregulating the medical cartel. Their open borders preference for flowers and granola to repel Soviet nuclear attacks did them in.

NOW the Dems and God’s Own Prohibitionists(link) are realizing how spoiler votes change election outcomes, and whining lest your vote benefit YOUR FREEDOM rather than some looter politician’s hand in your pocket! Ain’t that something? Listen to what the looter parties say about each other and remember all that on election day!

Withholding sex?

Racial collectivism AND shooting your kids?

No thanks. We’re with Jo Jorgensen, why? 

She's with Us!

She’s with Us!

Brazilian Sci-fi from 1926 featuring the usual beautiful daughter of a scientist touting prohibition and racial collectivism in America’s Black President 2228 by Monteiro Lobato, translated by J Henry Phillips (link)

Three dollars on Amazon Kindle

Find out the juicy details behind the mother of all economic collapses. Prohibition and The Crash–Cause and Effect in 1929 is available in two languages on Amazon Kindle, each at the cost of a pint of craft beer.

Brazilian blog

 

 

ANcapitulation versus Libertarian Party

Nazi beavers from a Canadian publication

An Austin Cartoonist suggested Beaver for LP mascot and anarchism as policy!

Collectivist infiltrators exploit primitive literalism to weaponize the NAP against the party that consistently cuts taxes and repeals bad laws. Could a communist anarchist Fifth Column destroy the LP from within? It is doing it now by exploiting three errors in thinking.

Ayn Rand formulated the non-aggression agreement in April of 1947, as National Socialist war criminals fled into Soviet Russia and South America to avoid trial and execution. In the same letter Rand explained that any definition which is not specific, not objective, is dangerous. The LP platform of 1972 advocates minimizing coercion–including coercion through menacing by government or criminals acting against individual rights–within the electoral system under the U.S. Constitution. Its goal is limitation of political power to the defense of individual rights through objectively defined laws against initiation of force, fraud and violence. This goal is what communists posing as libertarians are AGAINST

To defeat our purposes communist infiltrators claim that “no true libertarian” can collaborate with the world’s shortest Constitution because it includes the power “to lay taxes” (which meant inspection of imports funded by a tariff for revenue). This call to armed treason never mentions a better constitution and instead rejects the existence of national boundaries in favor of eternal warfare in the form of guerilla bands competing in forcible restraint, as in the Middle East.

Fascist infiltrators greet these efforts with whoops of joy, for they need only point to soi disant communist infiltrators and holler “murdering anarchists.” That tarbrush colors voter perceptions as they approach the ballot box to choose between endorsing our platform or the Kleptocracy. Anarchists infiltrating the platform committee after the Roe v Wade decision incorporated our 1972 platform plank ruined that victory for women’s rights by adding mandatory pederasty planks.(link) Just this year saboteurs declared checking passports and denying entry to herds of infected cattle aggression!(link) We’re lucky to be rid of that idiot plank, but the saboteurs who swatted us with it are still on the platform committee and need to resign or be fired so we may continue to replace the cleptocracy. 

WINNING!

Increasing is WINNING

Spoiler votes amended the Constitution to include a communist income tax and a prohibition amendment, both pointing loaded weapons at Americans. But Libertarian spoiler votes are reversing those types of laws by the same process. So every LP candidate who gets any votes at all wins by changing the laws. Spoiler means making kleptocracy looting difficult. 

spoiling for a fight

Increasing is WINNING!

Winning is what our voters get. They might not put someone on a payroll, but there is no way to ignore the platform demands of a party that gets 4.5 million votes in the Presidential race, and another 7 million votes in down-ballot races. In order to keep from losing to the other kleptocrats, republicans have to let go of girl-bullying and prohibition, and democrats have to let go of tax hikes and packing government jobs with officious meddlers. 

So 1. The NAP does not imply admitting barbarian invaders, 2. our spoiler votes are leveraged demands cannot be ignored and shift over 100 electoral votes, and 3. winning is what happens when the fascists and communists back away and repeal coercive legislation. 

Find out the juicy details behind the mother of all economic collapses. Prohibition and The Crash–Cause and Effect in 1929 is available in two languages on Amazon Kindle, each at the cost of a pint of craft beer.

Brazilian blog