Political Contributions for Freedom

Once all the Germans, were warlike and mean, but that couldn’t happen again,
We taught them a lesson in 1918, and they’ve hardly bothered us since then…

My father kept the household well-supplied with Songs by Tom Lehrer, nurturing in his offspring an appreciation of mathematics, the arts, and the importance of keeping an eye on the brainwashees of totalitarian ideologies. This training in youth paid off handsomely when routine scrutiny of today’s econazi Germany turned up a philanthropist with a cause–Nina Rosenwald. Her foundation is reportedly a major contributor to “political parties,” but her advocacy focuses on the so-called “rights” of “religious minorities.”

Nina’s website is dedicated entirely to bashing Mohammedanism, as if all other forms of mysticism were neither coercive nor deadly. Religious minorities and majorities alike traditionally regard non-mystical individuals (and each other) as mere rightless infidels. Yet the website belongs to someone whose relatives were hunted down and murdered by Germany’s 98% Catholic and Protestant voters and government–a government popularly elected and overwhelmingly re-elected beginning in 1928. Her Foundational prescriptions extoll “individual rights” without getting too specific about the nature of those individual rights. Her lessons on the difference between freedom from coercion and the bloodbaths brought about by the initiation of harmful, coercive and deadly force rely on examples without explicit generalization by induction. Her funding goes to German political parties, all of which embrace the exact same mystical altruism that prompted genocide as the eugenic solution for making the world safe for altruist collectivism.

Science and reason are receptive to observable and measurable reality. Superstition and mysticism absolutely reject all reason, logic and verification that conflicts with blind determination to interpret mythological fiction as Revealed Truth. One current example is the mountain of well-documented evidence showing that German National Socialism is a Christian movement. Its 25-point Program explicitly endorsed religious Christianity as faith. Its motto, “The Common Good Before the Individual Good” (Gemeinnutz geht vor Eigennutz) extolls altruist collectivism as the ethical basis for distinguishing right from wrong. Those words and God Is With Us (Gott Mitt Uns) were engraved on their coins. Its legislative “solutions” advance the initiation of naked force as the preferred method of correcting traits altruist ethicists imagine breed political incorrectness.  The outcome of all this was demonstrated in evidence presented at war crimes trials in Nuremberg and elsewhere after May 5, 1945. The True Believers’ reaction? Disbelief!

Socialist and altruist websites flatly assert that Hitler was a religious conservative, which he was. “Reds” depict that famous politician as the “right-wing” Christian he himself claimed to be. Catholic and Protestant websites, however, deny as fabrication all evidence that any German and Austrian nationalsocialists were ever Christians™ and produce tortuous argumentation to the contrary. Both of these factions of communo-fascist totalitarianism evade discussion of ethics (what distinguishes good from evil) but unanimously support altruism.

Mystical conservatives “just know” that Hitler’s followers “weren’t really” altruists. Looters less impressed by Divine Revelation are equally sure that Hitler’s followers “aren’t really” altruists, but are Christian. (NSDAP is both).  Their own lists of which communist dictators were “really” altruists vary, but ALL are in agreement that National Socialists are selfish “right wing” fascists. Just as correctly, National Socialists (and other Christian Conservatives) regard socialists of other parties as extremists. Each accuses the other of lying hypocrisy, never admitting that their ideal is the same: altruist collectivism achieved by the initiation of deadly force.

The Republican, Democratic and Green platforms are perfect examples of activated altruism indistinguishable in kind from other totalitarian faiths. In fact, Ayn Rand fired Random House for refusing to publish her essay quoting the Nazi platform alongside excerpts from Kennedy speeches.  Nina Rosenwald could avoid the errors* Ayn Rand committed in her dotage (when both Ayn and Hillary Clinton were Goldwater Republicans). Nina’s support for selected candidates running on Libertarian Party platforms in any of two dozen countries would to more to dismantle National Socialism and Islam than any volume of well-translated tu quoque.

**Supporting Nixon’s war to recapture the French opium regie of Cochin China; flying into a carpet-biting rage against the Libertarian Party that she herself designed.

If you understand the importance of ethical values crossing the language barrier, support your friendly neighborhood Libertarian Party in its efforts to repeal bad laws. This public service announcement by was brought to you by www.portugueseinterpreter.com

Advertisements

Germany’s Herbert Hoover

nazifoodczar1934

Courtesy of Holocaust Museum

Heroin-peddling Germany tried to stop the opium-producing Balkan States from undercutting Hungaro-Prussian markets after China banned addictive narcotic dumping in 1911. The attempt escalated into Balkan wars and backfired. Germany’s competitors in the dope market–England/India, France/Vietnam, and Switzerland–soon held the whip. Britain, Belgium and France demanded reparations payments for all war damage, while the US tried to collect on war loans made to belligerents.

The US, like Switzerland, had at first been neutral and for a time sold materiel and supplies to the Allies on credit, with no collateral. Herbert Hoover became America’s Food Czar in WWI to keep France and Belgium–and later Germany–from starving. But after communism conquered Russia, the Allies began losing and These States entered the War as an Associated (not Allied) power. One significant difference was that These States (unlike Australia) did not to to war with Turkey, and never ratified the Treaty of Versailles. The US instead made separate peace treaties containing many similar clauses, but as an Associated Power, NOT an ally.

nazifoodczar1935When dry-hope Hoover became president, Germany was selling heroin in dry America to pay war reparations. A Moratorium on Payments, thought Hoover in 1931, would enable America and the League to persuade Germany to quit manufacturing Heroin™ (which export had been the whole point of WW1). This Moratorium on Brains cost American businesses all commercial debt (Germans simply refused to pay), plus the balance on war loans (Allied deadbeats in Europe followed suit, hence the Moratorium on Brains). Today’s “carbon tax” subsidies to totalitarian governments, inspired by pseudoscience alleging global warming, are all too similar to Bert Hoover’s noble Moratorium.

The Moratorium also enabled the Christian National Socialist party to gain power. Germany ramped up addictive exports and rearmed. Walter Darré became Hitler’s Food Czar shortly after These States abandoned altruist prohibitionism by adopting the Liberal Party repeal plank in the election of 1932. America repudiated the Republican dry fanaticism that helped finance National Socialism’s takeover of Europe, after it was too late. But instead of adopting the freedom advocated by the Liberal Party in 1931, non-prohibitionist Americans accepted its repeal plank, then reverted to the altruistic Soviet Communist ideals advanced by the Populist Party as a source of comfort and inspiration. Intellectuals of the looter persuasion went from giving lip service to the nobility and altruism of prohibition to pacing and guiding Democrats on the nobility and altruism of socialism.

The George Waffen Bush asset-forfeiture crash was the direct result of faith-based zealotry infiltrating the Federal government as of his first Executive Order. Its causes were the same as after the 1928 election, which also packed the government with Teetotalitarian zealots. Surely the pattern is clear: dry fanatics + the coercive power of the violence of law = market collapse, credit crunches, liquidity crisis, unemployment, recession deepening into depression–always, in every case, motivated by altruistic intentions. If this is not what you want, consider a contribution to your local libertarian party–available in every State in the Union.