Tax Revolt Alternatives

Spoiler votes that entrenched can uproot socialism

Governments never learn. Only people learn.

Milton Friedman made it impossible ignore that there are two ways of dealing with people: voluntarily, or by force.

Tax collectors and the parties that send them out to collect more and higher taxes invariably choose the second option. Of course they paper it over with sanctimonious doublespeak. At every turn they liken their men with guns to acceptors of voluntary contributions. Media outlets are all tax-subsidized since 1971 (thanks to Nixon). This anti-libertarian subsidy doles out influence to entrenched gerontocracy election campaigns and helps sell an image of eleemosynary voluntarism through the initiation of force.

But what of the people at whom their guns are pointed? Thanks to the Nixon anti-libertarian law, many voters are completely unaware of the existence of a political party whose members seek to gradually replace coercion with voluntary cooperation wherever possible. Here’s what happens when media subsidies–designed to favor entrenched parties–interfere to produce uninformed voters.

Is taxing people at gunpoint worth it? As a Libertarian voter I just say “no” every time I cast a ballot. No, I do not expect all taxation to disappear by the time I unchain my bicycle to return home after voting. But I know for a fact that my LP vote will pack the clout of at least six votes in favor of reversing the trend toward increased taxation. In the case of individual rights for women, fewer than 4000 libertarian votes handed the Supreme Court the language they used in the Roe v. Wade decision, a relative vote clout of 10,000 for 1 if you believe it takes 50% of the total to get anything done. That’s winning!

Forcible expropriation leads to situations like the Bay District standoff. People follow good or bad examples, depending on what they can see. This guy observed the use of force and imagined two could play.

Richard Nixon and Congress changed the tax code in 1971 to keep you from finding out about the no-guns alternative. Like the snake tossed into baby Hercules’ crib, it was an attempt to kill off the Libertarian Party.

But here it is, 46 years later, and we’re still here. What’s more, four million voters–as many as voted in the entire State of Virginia–stood with us this last presidential election. Our vote share is up 328%, and we got way more of the popular vote than the difference between the two looter parties dedicated to the initiation of deadly force. Here’s the sigmoid political party substitution curve, the hockey stick Republican Dixiecrat fascists and Democrat communists do not want you to see:

So, which will it be? If you like what you see, by all means listen to what the Republicans and Democrats say about each other. If you would rather take a positive step to increase freedom by reversing the growth of coercion, read the Libertarian Party platform and vote with us.

If you need a website localized into Brazilian Portuguese, look us up at http://www.falascreve.com Falascreve is how they translated Orwell’s speech recognition neologism http://www.speakwrite.com.br in South America.

Try my Amazon Kindle explanation of Prohibition and The Crash and see how a small party wrote the plank that brought repeal.

Live on Amazon Kindle in 2 languages

 

Advertisements

Looter Media Attacks

Intellectuals of the looter persuasion are quoting Eric Trump as if their cynicism could modify his observation:

“That’s been the playbook in our government for so long: distract, disrupt, hurt, bash, defame, do whatever you can for your own political gain. It’s sad that we don’t have more morals or character or whatever it is.” —Eric Trump

The rough-and-tumble at issue became serious because just as the Libertarian Party was forming, Nixon’s National Socialist Congress passed the Anti-Libertarian Campaign Bribery law of 1971.  Two decades later,  a non-Kleptocracy candidate had this to say about the way the Altruist Broadcasting Corporation, Nationalsocialist Broadcasting Corporation and Communist Broadcasting Service (the dirty tricks guys) were attacking him in October of 1992:

Yes Ross Perot helped the entrenched looter kleptocracy divert voters away from the Libertarian Party. He was repaid in government cash subsidies taken out of the pockets of many honest working people who would rather not coerce anyone.  Perot reinforced the superstitious ignorance that caused These States to export brutal prohibitionism to South America, confident that would destroy the economies of Brazil, Colombia, Ecuador and Bolivia while setting up a fascist dictatorship in Peru. It is true that Reagan Administration manipulation of prohibition and tax laws did wreck a prohibition-created source of cash then fueling communist expansion. But the process corrupted the entire Mexican government into a huge 1930s Chicago.

Spoiler votes cast for Ross Perot unfrocked the more fanatical zealots the way The Liberal Party platform had in 1932. Perot’s spoiler votes reversed deficit spending and led to a surplus just as George Wallace spoiler votes turned Republicans into ku-klux Dixiecrats before the election subsidies law. The Clinton years were prosperous thanks mostly to the policy changes caused by Ross Perot spoiler votes. The looter press, naturally, thanked The Kleptocracy.

So yes, Eric Trump, you observe correctly, and you can do something to improve the situation. Vote Libertarian in the mid-term elections. Tell fake media that the Nixon Media Subsidies to favor the entrenched parties have polluted democracy. Come clean, follow Dad’s good example and say: “Libertarianism? I like it!” The LP platform, the one that got your Dad the nomination, takes less than half an hour to read. Borrowing our energy and Second Amendment planks landed you in the White House. I’m hoping I can count on your vote NOT as a token of appreciation. We both want back the cleaner elections we had before Richard Nixon altered the tax code to subsidize the initiation of force and undermine American morality.

“I like it. A lot of good points…” Those words guaranteed that the desperate, destitute and dishonest Gee Oh Pee urinalysis party would nominate Donald ten months later. That got Republicans government jobs, paychecks–and opportunities to have younger men violently put to death on both sides of the planet.  Three will get you five that that looter cartoonist will not quote your mention of the LP on his mudline fed by subsidized media pets.

If you need unsubsidized, competitive translations of laws, court decisions, testimony or decipherment of political speeches, come to Portugueseinterpreter.com. And for handcrafted certified immigration documents from Spanish and Portuguese to English and English into Brazilian Portuguese, visit http://www.braziliantranslated.com or http://www.juramentada.us

 

Libertarians cost GOP Popular vote win: Prohibition Repeal Introduced!

The following post GOP Rep Rohrabacher Introduces Bill To End Federal Marijuana Prohibition appeared first on A Libertarian Future at A Libertarian Future – Spreading a Libertarian message across the internet.. When at first you don’t succeed, try, try again. That’s definitely the motto of California Republican Congressman Dana Rohrabacher. Over the past four years…

via GOP Rep Rohrabacher Introduces Bill To End Federal Marijuana Prohibition — A Libertarian Future

Physics melts political phiction–thanks to Tony Heller

NOAA shows US December temperatures increasing at 0.1F per decade since 1930. Climate at a Glance | National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI) They are actually decreasing at 0.1F per decade since 1930. In order to make Zeke happy, I used only a stable set of stations which haven’t changed latitude since 1930. The NCDC…

via Corrupting December At NCDC — The Deplorable Climate Science Blog

Need a translator able to read a thermometer?

 

Germany’s Herbert Hoover

nazifoodczar1934

Courtesy of Holocaust Museum

Heroin-peddling Germany tried to stop the opium-producing Balkan States from undercutting Hungaro-Prussian markets after China banned addictive narcotic dumping in 1911. The attempt escalated into Balkan wars and backfired. Germany’s competitors in the dope market–England/India, France/Vietnam, and Switzerland–soon held the whip. Britain, Belgium and France demanded reparations payments for all war damage, while the US tried to collect on war loans made to belligerents.

The US, like Switzerland, had at first been neutral and for a time sold materiel and supplies to the Allies on credit, with no collateral. Herbert Hoover became America’s Food Czar in WWI to keep France and Belgium–and later Germany–from starving. But after communism conquered Russia, the Allies began losing and These States entered the War as an Associated (not Allied) power. One significant difference was that These States (unlike Australia) did not to to war with Turkey, and never ratified the Treaty of Versailles. The US instead made separate peace treaties containing many similar clauses, but as an Associated Power, NOT an ally.

nazifoodczar1935When dry-hope Hoover became president, Germany was selling heroin in dry America to pay war reparations. A Moratorium on Payments, thought Hoover in 1931, would enable America and the League to persuade Germany to quit manufacturing Heroin™ (which export had been the whole point of WW1). This Moratorium on Brains cost American businesses all commercial debt (Germans simply refused to pay), plus the balance on war loans (Allied deadbeats in Europe followed suit, hence the Moratorium on Brains). Today’s “carbon tax” subsidies to totalitarian governments, inspired by pseudoscience alleging global warming, are all too similar to Bert Hoover’s noble Moratorium.

The Moratorium also enabled the Christian National Socialist party to gain power. Germany ramped up addictive exports and rearmed. Walter Darré became Hitler’s Food Czar shortly after These States abandoned altruist prohibitionism by adopting the Liberal Party repeal plank in the election of 1932. America repudiated the Republican dry fanaticism that helped finance National Socialism’s takeover of Europe, after it was too late. But instead of adopting the freedom advocated by the Liberal Party in 1931, non-prohibitionist Americans accepted its repeal plank, then reverted to the altruistic Soviet Communist ideals advanced by the Populist Party as a source of comfort and inspiration. Intellectuals of the looter persuasion went from giving lip service to the nobility and altruism of prohibition to pacing and guiding Democrats on the nobility and altruism of socialism.

The George Waffen Bush asset-forfeiture crash was the direct result of faith-based zealotry infiltrating the Federal government as of his first Executive Order. Its causes were the same as after the 1928 election, which also packed the government with Teetotalitarian zealots. Surely the pattern is clear: dry fanatics + the coercive power of the violence of law = market collapse, credit crunches, liquidity crisis, unemployment, recession deepening into depression–always, in every case, motivated by altruistic intentions. If this is not what you want, consider a contribution to your local libertarian party–available in every State in the Union.